The history of the United States is a vast and intricate narrative, yet much of it remains obscured by dominant stories that often ignore or erase the realities of Indigenous peoples and African-descended communities. From manipulated census records to strategic financial systems, these hidden histories expose deliberate efforts to reshape identity, dispossess land, and control economic outcomes. This post dives deep into the historical mechanisms of identity erasure, land theft, and systemic economic exploitation while connecting them to present-day realities and encouraging critical re-evaluation.
The Evolution and Weaponization of Indigenous Identity
Identity in the U.S. has long been shaped by those in power. Terms like "Native," "American Indian," and "Black" have all served political purposes. Historically, the U.S. government recognized people as "American Indian" primarily in legal and bureaucratic contexts. As outlined by Dane Calloway, individuals were often forced to adopt imposed identities based on external classification systems rather than self-identified tribal affiliations. These categorizations, especially when applied to mixed ancestry, were used to limit access to rights, resources, and recognition.
The census itself became a weapon in this process. During the 1900 and 1930 counts, enumerators were instructed to apply blood quantum assessments or racial assumptions, often disregarding how individuals or communities identified. This practice resulted in the erasure of Indigenous presence, a phenomenon now referred to as "paper genocide."
The Racial Integrity Act and the Legacy of Eugenics
A glaring example of institutionalized identity erasure is the Racial Integrity Act of 1924, implemented in Virginia. Spearheaded by eugenicist Walter Plecker, the act sought to prevent interracial marriage and maintain a strict racial hierarchy by defining anyone not entirely white as "colored." This law led to the misclassification of many Indigenous individuals, making it difficult for future generations to claim tribal heritage and federal recognition.
The U.S. National Park Service confirms that this legislation was designed to advance eugenics by promoting "racial purity" through the manipulation of vital records. Nora Birchett’s research at the Library of Virginia further supports this, highlighting how vital records were altered to erase Indigenous identities from official history.
The Complex Spectrum of Indigenous Appearance and Ancestry
It is critical to note that the Indigenous peoples of the Americas were not homogenous. Most aboriginal Americans were described historically as copper-colored, with some having coarse hair and dark skin. This challenges the modern racial binary often imposed on historical narratives. While there were indeed African-descended individuals brought to America during the transatlantic slave trade, this group represented only a minority of the population. Moreover, some researchers and oral histories suggest the transatlantic slave narrative may have been told in reverse in some cases—with Indigenous Americans mislabeled as Africans and shipped out of or into their homelands.
This is supported by historical accounts and research, such as in the document "Urban Removal & Renewal Forced Millions Of Indigenous Negros Out Of Their Own Homelands", which documents the mass displacement of Indigenous American communities identified as "Negros."
Economic Exploitation: From Trade Systems to Financial Enslavement
Economic systems have also played a critical role in marginalizing Indigenous and African-descended peoples. Calloway points out that "Negro farmers," many of whom were Indigenous people, were once foundational to the American economy. Before industrialization and the use of currency, bartering was the norm. However, with the introduction of legal tender notes, credit systems, and later, Federal Reserve Notes, landowners found themselves entangled in exploitative economic schemes.
The crop lien system and floating debt enabled buyers to underpay Indigenous farmers, often reselling goods at inflated prices. This debt trap led to widespread land forfeitures and economic ruin. The Preemption Act of 1841 enabled squatters—often referred to as "tenant farmers"—to purchase Indigenous land after a short residency period. Combined with federal reclassification of these lands as "public," this legalized a form of land theft.
Bonds, Labor, and Financial Control
As slavery was officially abolished, it transitioned into what Calloway calls its industrialized version: employment. Through systems like sharecropping and wage labor, the exploitation continued. Bonds, once used for enslaving people, transformed into labor contracts. Employers became creditors, while workers were recast as debtors.
The National Bank Act of 1864 and Executive Order 6102—which mandated the handover of private gold to Federal Reserve Banks—further consolidated financial power away from Indigenous and marginalized communities. Legal tender notes, originally backed by gold, were replaced with fiat currency, severing economic ties between value and labor.
Challenging Conventional Historical Narratives
Calloway and other researchers, such as Dr. Clyde Winters, argue for a reexamination of who the first inhabitants of America truly were. DNA evidence and linguistic studies suggest that the earliest settlers may have been of African descent, complicating the idea that Native American ancestry is solely rooted in Mongolian or Siberian migration. Winters posits that these populations were gradually reclassified and disconnected from their heritage through centuries of documentation and policy.
Still, it is essential to recognize that while African ancestry plays a role in the story, the vast majority of Indigenous peoples were uniquely Native to the Americas—distinct in culture, appearance, and origin from later African arrivals.
The Role of Government and Institutions in Historical Injustice
Federal policies such as the Legal Tender Act and the establishment of the Federal Reserve are not just financial footnotes—they are deeply intertwined with the historical disenfranchisement of Indigenous people. By controlling currency, setting banking laws, and redefining land ownership through legislation, institutions ensured that power remained centralized and inaccessible to those outside of the dominant class.
Reclaiming Identity and Land
One of the most important takeaways from these discussions is the call to action. Calloway and others advocate for Indigenous and African-descended peoples to reclaim their history and demand reparative justice. This includes legal challenges to restore land, efforts to change how history is taught, and the rejection of imposed identities.
Self-identification using tribal names, historical research, and direct community knowledge can serve as powerful tools in resisting further erasure. Land held in trust by the federal government can also serve as a foundation for rebuilding tribal sovereignty and economic development.
Conclusion: Knowing the Past to Change the Future
Understanding the systemic ways in which history has been altered, identities erased, and lands stolen is essential for building a more just future. The call to critically assess history, trust one’s lineage, and seek out primary documentation is not merely academic—it's an act of resistance.
As Calloway often urges: "Write it down and look it up for yourself." The journey toward truth and justice begins with awareness and ends with action.
Key References:
Dane Calloway, "Don't Waste Your Time On FBA Until You Watch This"
Dane Calloway, "No, Immigrants Were Not Part Of The Foundation Of America"
Nora Birchett, "Records of a Paper Genocide"
U.S. National Park Service, "The Racial Integrity Act, 1924"
"Paper Genocide: The Erasure of Native People in Census Counts"
Dr. Clyde Winters, "Wait, There Is Evidence of Black Native American DNA?"
Urban Removal & Renewal: Forced Millions Of Indigenous Negros Out Of Their Own Homelands (PDF)
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
1. What does "paper genocide" mean? It refers to the systematic erasure of Indigenous identity through documentation, including misclassifying race in census records, vital statistics, and legal frameworks.
2. Were all Indigenous people in America of African descent? No. While some African-descended people were brought through the slave trade, the majority of Indigenous Americans were native to the Americas, described historically as copper-colored with varying features.
3. How did the Preemption Act of 1841 affect Indigenous land ownership? It enabled squatters to claim land after only 14 months, often resulting in the loss of ancestral lands for Indigenous people.
4. What role did banking policies play in Indigenous economic dispossession? Laws like the National Bank Act and the creation of fiat currency consolidated financial control and disconnected Indigenous people from wealth and land.
5. Can Indigenous people reclaim land today? Yes, through legal avenues involving tribal recognition, trust land, and historical documentation, some tribes are regaining land and sovereignty.
Thanks for reading,
Pedro
#HiddenHistory #IdentityErasure #AmericanHistory #ForgottenTruths #IndigenousRights #PaperGenocide #HistoricalJustice #LandTheft #EconomicExploitation #NativeAmericanHistory #SystemicOppression #UnmaskingHistory #HistoricalNarrative #HistoryMatters #ReclaimingIdentity